Regardless, the law simply says that he is not guilty of the charges AS
PRESENTED. Innocence is a nice thought but not factual. If double jeopardy
did not exist his so-called "innocence" might be turned into a guilty
verdict. So, once again for the stubborn of thought - he is not innocent.
Rather he is NOT GUILTY OF THE CHARGES AS PRESENTED. The jury has already
said that they did not believe the PRESENTATION OF THE CHARGES beyond a
reasonable doubt.Let his publicity machine proclaim "innocence". They will
do a masterful job and lure loving teens into expensive concerts.

In the meantime let his antenna wire wrap around his.......


"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Wes:

I disagree, and as tough as it is, I am an American first with real
respect for the forefathers...

... and a person suspicious to Jackson's motives and actions second...

Truth is, you run the gauntlet and face a jury of your peers--if found
innocent, YOU ARE!!!

Any man who would deny that is worse than the criminal which may go
free...

To sum it up short and sweet--forefathers believed it is better to let a
hundred guilty men go free than to convict one innocent man... you can
read Jefferson's, Washington's and Franklins' personal writings to verify
this is correct...

Warmest regards,
John

"Wes Stewart" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:45:19 +0100, "Christopher O'Callaghan"
wrote:

MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES

Excuse me, but "Cleared of all charges" or "Not guilty" are not the
same as "innocent".