MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES

Goody. Were his antennas charged with anything?

"Christopher O'Callaghan" wrote in message
...
MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES

Yes, he is quite obviously as innocent as OJ... with his money, I think
we knew that right off... still, it would interesting hearing how the
jury arrived at that conclusion. It is almost like they were angry at
the prosecutor and sending him a message with their verdict--as I
expected them to find him guilty of at least the misdemeanor of
furnishing wine to the kids...

John

"Christopher O'Callaghan" wrote in message
...
MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES

John Smith wrote:
Yes, he is quite obviously as innocent as OJ...

Which proves that $500,000 lawers are better than $50,000
lawyers. Why are we surprised?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:45:19 +0100, "Christopher O'Callaghan"
wrote:

MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES

Excuse me, but "Cleared of all charges" or "Not guilty" are not the
same as "innocent".

Wes:

I disagree, and as tough as it is, I am an American first with real
respect for the forefathers...

.... and a person suspicious to Jackson's motives and actions second...

Truth is, you run the gauntlet and face a jury of your peers--if found
innocent, YOU ARE!!!

Any man who would deny that is worse than the criminal which may go
free...

To sum it up short and sweet--forefathers believed it is better to let a
hundred guilty men go free than to convict one innocent man... you can
read Jefferson's, Washington's and Franklins' personal writings to
verify this is correct...

Warmest regards,
John

"Wes Stewart" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:45:19 +0100, "Christopher O'Callaghan"
wrote:

MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES

Excuse me, but "Cleared of all charges" or "Not guilty" are not the
same as "innocent".

Regardless, the law simply says that he is not guilty of the charges AS
PRESENTED. Innocence is a nice thought but not factual. If double jeopardy
did not exist his so-called "innocence" might be turned into a guilty
verdict. So, once again for the stubborn of thought - he is not innocent.
Rather he is NOT GUILTY OF THE CHARGES AS PRESENTED. The jury has already
said that they did not believe the PRESENTATION OF THE CHARGES beyond a
reasonable doubt.Let his publicity machine proclaim "innocence". They will
do a masterful job and lure loving teens into expensive concerts.

In the meantime let his antenna wire wrap around his.......


"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Wes:

I disagree, and as tough as it is, I am an American first with real
respect for the forefathers...

... and a person suspicious to Jackson's motives and actions second...

Truth is, you run the gauntlet and face a jury of your peers--if found
innocent, YOU ARE!!!

Any man who would deny that is worse than the criminal which may go
free...

To sum it up short and sweet--forefathers believed it is better to let a
hundred guilty men go free than to convict one innocent man... you can
read Jefferson's, Washington's and Franklins' personal writings to verify
this is correct...

Warmest regards,
John

"Wes Stewart" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:45:19 +0100, "Christopher O'Callaghan"
wrote:

MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES

Excuse me, but "Cleared of all charges" or "Not guilty" are not the
same as "innocent".

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:28:22 -0400, "Adelphia"
wrote:

In the meantime let his antenna wire wrap around his.......

Hey, how 'bout the blond-headed lady who released a white dove with
each proclamation of "Not guilty"?

I've seen it all, now...

bob
k5qwg

.... as I said, I fear men with no, respect for and, devotion to
following the constitution as much as the criminals themselves--perhaps
even more...

Still, Jackson would not get within a mile of my children... (course
they are all grown now), I recommend others make sure of the same...

Warmest regards,
John

"Adelphia" wrote in message
...
Regardless, the law simply says that he is not guilty of the charges
AS PRESENTED. Innocence is a nice thought but not factual. If double
jeopardy did not exist his so-called "innocence" might be turned into
a guilty verdict. So, once again for the stubborn of thought - he is
not innocent. Rather he is NOT GUILTY OF THE CHARGES AS PRESENTED. The
jury has already said that they did not believe the PRESENTATION OF
THE CHARGES beyond a reasonable doubt.Let his publicity machine
proclaim "innocence". They will do a masterful job and lure loving
teens into expensive concerts.

In the meantime let his antenna wire wrap around his.......


"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Wes:

I disagree, and as tough as it is, I am an American first with real
respect for the forefathers...

... and a person suspicious to Jackson's motives and actions
second...

Truth is, you run the gauntlet and face a jury of your peers--if
found innocent, YOU ARE!!!

Any man who would deny that is worse than the criminal which may go
free...

To sum it up short and sweet--forefathers believed it is better to
let a hundred guilty men go free than to convict one innocent man...
you can read Jefferson's, Washington's and Franklins' personal
writings to verify this is correct...

Warmest regards,
John

"Wes Stewart" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:45:19 +0100, "Christopher O'Callaghan"
wrote:

MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES

Excuse me, but "Cleared of all charges" or "Not guilty" are not the
same as "innocent".

Was that a white dove or a bleached pigeon?
KM6AB

Bob Miller wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:28:22 -0400, "Adelphia"
wrote:


In the meantime let his antenna wire wrap around his.......


Hey, how 'bout the blond-headed lady who released a white dove with
each proclamation of "Not guilty"?

I've seen it all, now...

bob
k5qwg