.... as I said, I fear men with no, respect for and, devotion to
following the constitution as much as the criminals themselves--perhaps
even more...

Still, Jackson would not get within a mile of my children... (course
they are all grown now), I recommend others make sure of the same...

Warmest regards,
John

"Adelphia" wrote in message
...
Regardless, the law simply says that he is not guilty of the charges
AS PRESENTED. Innocence is a nice thought but not factual. If double
jeopardy did not exist his so-called "innocence" might be turned into
a guilty verdict. So, once again for the stubborn of thought - he is
not innocent. Rather he is NOT GUILTY OF THE CHARGES AS PRESENTED. The
jury has already said that they did not believe the PRESENTATION OF
THE CHARGES beyond a reasonable doubt.Let his publicity machine
proclaim "innocence". They will do a masterful job and lure loving
teens into expensive concerts.

In the meantime let his antenna wire wrap around his.......


"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Wes:

I disagree, and as tough as it is, I am an American first with real
respect for the forefathers...

... and a person suspicious to Jackson's motives and actions
second...

Truth is, you run the gauntlet and face a jury of your peers--if
found innocent, YOU ARE!!!

Any man who would deny that is worse than the criminal which may go
free...

To sum it up short and sweet--forefathers believed it is better to
let a hundred guilty men go free than to convict one innocent man...
you can read Jefferson's, Washington's and Franklins' personal
writings to verify this is correct...

Warmest regards,
John

"Wes Stewart" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:45:19 +0100, "Christopher O'Callaghan"
wrote:

MICHEAL JACKSON CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES

Excuse me, but "Cleared of all charges" or "Not guilty" are not the
same as "innocent".