Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Price wrote:
"Owen" wrote in message ... Ed Price wrote: So practically, since the average ham has a receiver with a sensitivity in the order of a microvolt, then your antenna limits your minimum discernable signal level to around 65 uV/m. Maybe 100 uV/m to be on the safe side. In fact, the technique calls for measuring signals on the rx from the noise floor to about 20dB above it. The noise floor for receivers today is typically -135dBm. No, the technique does not use an S-meter. In a nutshell, it uses Ed Hare's (W1RFI) technique for calibrating the noise floor of the receiver, using an external attenuator to keep the rx input below the AGC threshold, and measuring the audio output with signal and the audio output from rx internal noise as inputs to a calculation of the input signal power. Applying external attenuator losses, feedline losses and antenna factor allows calculation of field strength. Owen IS Hare's technique published somewhere on the web? Yes it is, see http://www.arrl.org/~ehare/aria/ARIA_MANUAL_TESTING.pdf . That paper outlines the principle of using the known rx noise floor as a baseline for measurements. I have developed a piece of software for making the associated audio power measurements and automating the calculation / documentation process. Thanks for taking the time to review the loop model, it is appreciated. Owen PS: I saw your other response and Richard's suggestion that I use the units capability of Mathcad. Sometimes the unit capability gets in the way of readability, for instance I think you could not take the log of E in volts / meter divided by V in volts and get dBV/m, I think you would need to split E into two variables (say E' and l) and say AF=20*log(E'/V)/l. Additionally, you can spend more time trying to get the units to work, so that they don't collapse to fundamental units of MLT etc, than solving the numerical side of the problem. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Owen" wrote in message ... Ed Price wrote: "Owen" wrote in message ... Ed Price wrote: So practically, since the average ham has a receiver with a sensitivity in the order of a microvolt, then your antenna limits your minimum discernable signal level to around 65 uV/m. Maybe 100 uV/m to be on the safe side. In fact, the technique calls for measuring signals on the rx from the noise floor to about 20dB above it. The noise floor for receivers today is typically -135dBm. No, the technique does not use an S-meter. In a nutshell, it uses Ed Hare's (W1RFI) technique for calibrating the noise floor of the receiver, using an external attenuator to keep the rx input below the AGC threshold, and measuring the audio output with signal and the audio output from rx internal noise as inputs to a calculation of the input signal power. Applying external attenuator losses, feedline losses and antenna factor allows calculation of field strength. Owen IS Hare's technique published somewhere on the web? Yes it is, see http://www.arrl.org/~ehare/aria/ARIA_MANUAL_TESTING.pdf . That paper outlines the principle of using the known rx noise floor as a baseline for measurements. I have developed a piece of software for making the associated audio power measurements and automating the calculation / documentation process. Thanks for taking the time to review the loop model, it is appreciated. Owen Thanks; looks like I have a lot of reading to do! -- Ed WB6WSN El Cajon, CA USA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
160 Meter Band Balanced Coaxial Receiving Loop Antrenna by KN4LF | Shortwave | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
Antenna Advice | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |