Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Richard:
Your last paragraph (quoted below) is a good summary. It, or something like it, should be an introductory paragraph in every vertical's data sheet and advertisement. Well done. To have a vertical perform well for the important (for DX) angles between 2 and 12 degrees (above the horizon) one would like to have a copper sea starting one or two wavelengths from the antenna. I have worked 10 watt backpack stations in the UK when they were by the sea side. No hope to do so when they are inland. 73, Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A. Home: "Richard Harrison" wrote in snip The point is that high conductivity is only needed very close to the tower for the ground wave. For a sky wave, you need high conductivity at the reflection point for a vertically polarized wave. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Resonant and Non-resonant Radials | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
HF Vertical design(s) | Antenna | |||
Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna |