Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
But, hey, what's 2% error in a conservation of energy equation? The error is yours. During steady-state, the forward power in the thin film is 1.0101 watts. 1% of that is 0.0101 watts. 1.0101 - 0.0101 = one watt delivered to the "load". 100% accuracy is guaranteed because it is a mental conceptual exercise. To summarize: Forward power in air is one watt. Reflected power in air is zero watts. Forward power in the thin-film is 1.010101010101010101 watts. Reflected power in the thin-film is 0.10101010101010101 watts. Power delivered through Surface B is exactly one watt, exactly the output of the laser. Exactly the difference between the steady-state forward and reflected power in the thin-film. Well, for 1W of light and presuming cancellation (you cannot achieve full cancellation) That's the great thing about a mental conceptual example. Full cancellation is guaranteed. So, energy is conserved, and there is no such thing as complete cancellation. True for real world stuff. False for mental conceptual examples like the one being discussed. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mobile Antenna Matching Question | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |