On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:47:19 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
So, energy is conserved, and there is no such thing as complete
cancellation.
True for real world stuff. False for mental conceptual examples
like the one being discussed.

Hi Tor,

So, do you see by this example what I describe as the devil's in the
details? Absolute proof of complete cancellation using referenced
math, which is then abstracted to another field to prove imponderables
(mental conceptual examples).

And what purpose is served through this prostitution of citations?
That thin films completely cancel reflections? - they do not. That
optical interfaces exhibit complete transmission? - they do not. What
makes the proofs of these unproven phenomenon necessary such as to
dismiss the correct answers? Dare we follow the thread of a suspect
theory to arrive at other, equally flawed steps along the way?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC