LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Report Post  
Old July 18th 05, 05:12 AM
Old Ed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Reg,

Our definition of "worked fine" was that the measured SWR was
consistent with the rated DC resistance and tolerance. As I recall,
we were using 51 Ohm 5% resistors. Typical SWR was under
1.1 up to 100 MHz, and 1.2 to 1.3 at 500 MHz for the bent-lead
(lesser performing) version.

These loads were just for handy lab use, and were not products or
calibrated test equipment, of course.

Ed

"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
Hi Ed.

Regarding your big 2-watt carbon resistors at 500 MHz -

what values of reflection coefficient or SWR were experienced when you
say they "worked fine". Can you remember? Or did you have some other
way of assessing "fine" performance?

The DC value has to be allowed a resonably large tolerance about its
nominal value and the HF performance cannot be any better than that.
----
Reg, G4FGQ





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SERIOUS MONEY OPPORTUNITY-$5 INVESTMENT-HIGH RESPONSE RATE-QUICK RETURNS [email protected] Swap 0 March 14th 05 09:10 PM
Improved AM Detector John Byrns Shortwave 44 July 22nd 04 06:08 AM
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 03:45 AM
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) N2EY Policy 0 November 30th 03 01:28 PM
Response to "21st Century" Part Three (Communicator License) N2EY Policy 0 November 30th 03 01:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017