Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Harrison wrote: Jim Kelley wrote: "That`s because power doesn`t propagate, I hasten to add - neither do Poynting vectors.: Some world-class experts disagree with Jim. Here is a sample quotation using the words "power flow". From E.M. Purcell writing about "Antenna Gain and Receiving Cross Section" on page 19 of "Radar System Engineering" edited by Louis M. Ridenour: "If the transmitting antenna were to radiate energy isotropically-that is, uniformly in all directions-the power flow through unit area at a distance R, from the antenna could be found by dividing P, the total radiated power, by 4piRsquared." Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI There's nothing wrong with calculating the power per unit area at any point in a transmission line. I'm sorry if I gave some other impression. The problem I have is with believing that the calculated value propagates as if it were an electromagnetic field. The Poynting vector is useful for making calculations, but it not a useful tool for explaining the behavior of natural phenomenon. 73, ac6xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Failure of Poor Concepts in Discussing Glare Reduction | Antenna | |||
Have you had an FT-817 finals failure? | Equipment | |||
Have you had an FT-817 finals failure? | Equipment |