| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cecil Moore wrote: And given the following example from "Fields & Waves ..." by Ramo & Whinnery, what do you think changes the direction of the Pz2- Poynting Vector such that it vectorally adds to the Pz1+ Poynting Vector resulting in the Pz2+ Poynting Vector? 100W XMTR---50 ohm line---+---291.4 ohm line---1698.5 ohm load Pz1+ = 100W-- Pz2+ = 200W-- --Pz1- = 0W --Pz2- = 100W If you can answer that simple question to the satisfaction of everyone, the discussion will be over. Any reflections (and Poynting vector reversals) would be caused by the presence of impedance discontinuities - not by anything else. In the absence of impedance discontinuities, the transmission line would appear to be infinitely long and would not produce reflections. ac6xg |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The Failure of Poor Concepts in Discussing Glare Reduction | Antenna | |||
| Have you had an FT-817 finals failure? | Equipment | |||
| Have you had an FT-817 finals failure? | Equipment | |||