Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
EZNEC says that a 66 ft dipole used on 3.8 MHz, fed with 450 ohm
ladder-line, will have an SWR of greater than 100:1. This can lead to all sorts of undesirable effects including an almost impossible to match impedance at the tuner. A practical rule of thumb might be in order, e.g. mine = no more than 20:1 SWR on the ladder-line. Fact is Cecil I never pay any attention to VSWR, just complex numbers. Anyway your comments made me re-analyze the problem, and I realize I made an error in the transmission line and antenna tuner analysis. I thought the transmission line loss I came up with was a bit low. The final numbers are shown below. See if you agree with me; then explain where I went wrong, and why the match will not work. 66 ft dipole, 30 ft high, #14 AWG: Input Z = 11.3 - j961 ohms. 50 ft of 600 ohm line: Input Z = 5.48 + j189.85 ohms, loss = 1.95 dB Matching network: Shunt C = 296 pF, Series L = 22.8 uH. (Obviously half the L for each side of a balanced.line.) Max line voltage: 1.5 kW in = 3 kV. Tuner loss: 0.44 dB. Incidentally have you ever looked at a typical airport NDB site? For example a 45 ft monopole on 350 kHz has an input impedance of 0.2 - j7054, which is a VSWR of 4.9 million : 1 -- whatever that means -- virtually touching the edge of the Smith Chart. I have even seen 5 mile approach NDBs with 30 ft monopoles. Marine installations for 400 to 500 kHz operation frequently had electrically very small inverted "L" antennas. Of course 5 S/m sure helped, but the losses in the tuners must have been significant. 73, Frank |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Short lot 80 and possible 160 antenna suggestions | Antenna | |||
Discone antenna plans | Antenna | |||
significance of feedline orientation | Shortwave | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave |