Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
Is there anybody about who still imagines that an SWR meter, located in the transmitter, or even on the other side of the tuner, indicates SWR on the transmission line between transmitter and the antenna? If it's a stand-alone SWR meter with three foot 50 ohm coax cables on the input and output, then it is located in a 50 ohm environment and is indeed indicating the correct SWR. The thing that makes an SWR meter indicate a valid value is if its physical environment is extensive enough to force the impedance ratio of Vfor/Ifor = Vref/Iref = 50 ohms. Back when I got my first license, those things were called transmatches. Seems you would like that name better than SWR meter. TRANSmitter MATCHing device = Transmatch. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What is your most popular band you listen to on your scanner | Scanner | |||
1946 Popular Science Radio Make It Fix It Manual | Broadcasting | |||
Monitoring Times vs. Popular Communications? | Shortwave | |||
Popular Communications magazine July 2004: BPL article | Shortwave | |||
IM So Popular | Policy |