Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
Cecil your argument begins with a big "If". If only pigs could fly! An SWR meter is no different from any other piece of measuring equipment. One shouldn't use a DC ohm-meter to measure RF impedance. One shouldn't use an SWR meter designed for a Z0=50 ohm environment in an environment where Z0 is unknown or non-existant. Earlier, I didn't mean to imply that the SWR meter was known as a Transmatch. It was the entire antenna tuner that was (and still is) known as a Transmatch. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What is your most popular band you listen to on your scanner | Scanner | |||
1946 Popular Science Radio Make It Fix It Manual | Broadcasting | |||
Monitoring Times vs. Popular Communications? | Shortwave | |||
Popular Communications magazine July 2004: BPL article | Shortwave | |||
IM So Popular | Policy |