LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Report Post  
Old August 22nd 05, 09:57 PM
Richard Harrison
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dan, KB0QIL wrote:
"From a practical perspective it would seem to me that building a 40
foot crnter loaded dipole and putting it in the sttic or on the roof
would probably perform somewhat better."

The roof or attic may be noisy receiving locations.

The ionospheric spot which effectively reflects a high frequency signal
to a point beyond the horizon is variable so that the received signal
direction varies from the true bearing of the transmitter, The received
signal elevation angle also varies from that predicted by the assumed
layer height for any given path length, and may change from instant to
instant.

The differences between predicted and actual azimuth and elevation
angles may at any momement be several degrees. These differences make
high frequency direction finding complicated, but results may be good
enough for some pracical purposes. Optimum vertical and horizontal
angles are sought in directional antenna design but enough beamwidth is
needed to accommodate
the angular variations which occur.

Over sea water, ground wave propagation is good and loss is low as
compared with propagation over earth. Frequencies up to about 5 MHz are
used for communications beyond the line of sight between ships and
between ships and shore. These frequencies are also used for tropical
broadcasting among islands.

For ionospheric reflection to near spots beyond the line of sight, near
vertical incidence reflections are used. The frequency must be below the
maximum usable frequency for vertical incidence at the transmitting
site.

For ground wave propagation a vertical transmitting antenna is used.

Horizontally polarized antennas are often used for sky wave signals
because reflection from the ionosphere makes equal strength components,
horizontally polarized and vertically polarized, from the incident wave,
regardless of its initial polarization.

Most disturbing noise is that generated within ground wave range of the
receiving antenna. It is vertically polarized.There is no ground wave
propagation of horizontally polarized waves. Thus, a horizontally
polarized receiving antenna ignores much of the available noise.
However, it receives as much signal from the sky wave as a vertically
polarized antenna would.

If a single antenna is to be used for both transmitting and receiving a
shy wave, a forizontally polarized antenna may be the better choice due
to its noise rejection. See "Radio Antenna Engineering" by Edmund A.
Laport for details.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
160 thru 20 meter homebrew vertical system denton Antenna 16 September 14th 04 07:37 PM
10, 6 & 2 Meter Vertical Marvin Rosen Antenna 9 January 11th 04 07:38 PM
Advice good 80 meter vertical Fjx1 Antenna 5 December 9th 03 09:34 PM
Conix 160 Meter Vertical --CQ Uncle Peter Antenna 0 November 18th 03 10:02 PM
Smith Chart Quiz Radio913 Antenna 315 October 21st 03 05:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017