Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think Roy is referring to a T configuration rather than an upside-down L.
The currents will balance in the T so wire size is limited by physical considerations rather than electrical. This is just another form of a capacity hat. The net result is to raise the radiation resistance. "dansawyeror" wrote in message ... Roy, Thanks. This might be feasible. The site would support 50 foot wire from the tip. At 500 watts what would the current in the horizontal leg be? In other words what is the minimum effective gage? What is the purpose of this leg? Is it capacitive or does it begin to look like something else. What are it directional characteristics? Dipoles nodes are perpendicular while long wire nodes are parallel. Dan Roy Lewallen wrote: Frank wrote: . . . I agree with comments about adding a horizontal wire to the top of the vertical; it will probably be easier than a capacity hat. I am overloaded with work at the moment, but would like to attempt a model in a week or so when I have less work. Take a look also at a tee type arrangement. That is, a horizontal wire with the tip of the vertical connected at or near its center. It might have some advantages over connecting the wire's end to the vertical. But of course it might be more involved to construct. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
160 thru 20 meter homebrew vertical system | Antenna | |||
10, 6 & 2 Meter Vertical | Antenna | |||
Advice good 80 meter vertical | Antenna | |||
Conix 160 Meter Vertical --CQ | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna |