Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Starting point for the inverted L with sloping top loading wire.
45' high, 25.8' sloping wire at the top, 29 feet high at the far end. #12 THHN Insulated copper wire, stranded. Mounted 7" above the earth, directly to a 3' ground rod (strictly for mechanical support, as I had a prefab mount with 3/8x24 on one end and SO-29 on the other) Predicted Radiation Resistance (Devoldere): 25.8 ohms, very good ground (rich pastoral, midwest). I see I had confused feedpoint impedance and radiation resistance (after reading some more in Devoldere's "Low-Band DX'ing") According to Figure 9-94, the radiation resistance for my inverted L is approximately 25 ohms. According to EZnec 4.1, source data says: Impedance = 25.58 + J 1.872 ohms at 3600 khz. When I measure the antenna with the MFJ-269, I get: R=37 and X=0 If Devoldere and EZNEC are correct (although EZNEC may or may not be measuring radiation resistance), then my radial-less inverted L is showing ground losses of 37-25=12 ohms. If so, then my efficiency, without radials is: 25/(25+12) or 25/37 or approximately 67%. Before installing radials this morning, I just want to make sure I'm looking at the right variables and interpreting them properly. 4 radials, laying on the ground, will be ready to install when the sun comes up. 4 more later in the day, etc., up to a total of 16 (the amount of wire I have ready to go). Each time I put down 4, I'll take another measurement with the 269. For kicks, I might take a measurement with just one or two first. ....hasan, N0AN |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Noise Figure Measurements | Homebrew | |||
Wire antenna - dipole vs inverted vee | Antenna | |||
Flex-Weave Inverted L | Antenna |