Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Larry
You are talking about a shielded magloop rather than a full wave length single quad loop... They exhibit reasonable performance for their size and are very quiet. ie the signal to noise is often better on the magloop than a larger antenna. I have seen claims that the signal strength is maybe 2 S points lower but the noise is 5 S points lower. I have heard of configurations where a dipole is used for TX and a magloop for RX. The at antenna tuning makes for less chance of a strong nearby signal desensitizing your RX. The downside of that is that you have to have some method of doing this remote tuning. Bandwidths in the order of 20-30khz on 80m are not uncommon. They can be built for 2:1 or 3:1 frequency coverage range. I have no idea how the performance changes at the far end. I actually havent built one weak grin Hope this helps. Cheers Bob W5/VK2YQA larry wrote: this popularity....What charateristics, besides seemingly not needing as much geography to need to put up, does this antenna have that make is so appealing? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Yaesu FT-857D questions | Equipment | |||
Loop antenna question | Shortwave |