Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks a lot for your advice. I would like to use the loop on 80 meters
also, but I thought that the self-resonant frequency of a 100 feet perimeter loop would be too low for the loop to be resonated on 80 meters with a series capacitor. Also, from reading some material in the ARRL 20th edition Antenna Book, I noticed that Ted Hart, W5QJR, used a gamma-matching arrangement to feed his loop. If a small interior loop is used to feed the main loop, are capacitors needed to couple the coax feed line to the small loop? Hopefully, these capacitors would not need to be changed after the initial setup procedures have taken place. "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... [additional text] The best method of feeding is via a small loop of wire inside the main loop in the same plane. The small loop is approx 1/5th of the diameter of the main loop and is insulated from the main loop. The small coupling loop is just a self-supporting wire between the inner and outer conductors of a 50-ohm coaxial feedline and can be located at the bottom of the main loop. [additional text] With a perimeter of 100 feet, on 160 meters performance will be about 1 S-unit worse than a 1/2-wave dipole. On 80 meters performance will be about the same as a full-size 1/2-wave dipole at the same height. The perimeter is too long to work on 40m. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John,
The highest operating frequency of a magloop occurs when the tuning capacitor is set to minimum or zero and the circumference of the loop is approximately 1/2-wavelength. That's rather obvious. 100 feet circumference = 30 metres. So greatest working frequency is 150 / 30 = 5 MHz. A small coupling loop is far and away the best method of feeding a magloop. Nothing could be mechanically more simple. There are no additional components and the loop is isolated from the main loop. Furthermore its diameter for a good impedance match to 50 ohms tends to be independent of operating frequency. The wire diameter of the coupling loop need be no larger than that of the inner conductor of the coaxial feedline to which it is connected. I've never heard of Ted Hart. But, of course, a gamma match will work. However the direct connection to the main loop unbalances it and encourages radiation from the feedline. In comparison with a small coupling loop it is also mechanically complicated. ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks again, Reg. You can be sure I am printing out your comments and
storing them in my loop project folder. I will also be perusing your web site http://www.btinternet.com/~g4fgq.regp/ I will need some info on size and placement of the coupling loop. Regarding Ted Hart, W5QJR, there is some information about him at http://www.nab.org/conventions/radio...o.asp?id=10459 A Google search on Ted-Hart Loop-Antenna finds about 100 hits. "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... John, The highest operating frequency of a magloop occurs when the tuning capacitor is set to minimum or zero and the circumference of the loop is approximately 1/2-wavelength. That's rather obvious. 100 feet circumference = 30 metres. So greatest working frequency is 150 / 30 = 5 MHz. A small coupling loop is far and away the best method of feeding a magloop. Nothing could be mechanically more simple. There are no additional components and the loop is isolated from the main loop. Furthermore its diameter for a good impedance match to 50 ohms tends to be independent of operating frequency. The wire diameter of the coupling loop need be no larger than that of the inner conductor of the coaxial feedline to which it is connected. I've never heard of Ted Hart. But, of course, a gamma match will work. However the direct connection to the main loop unbalances it and encourages radiation from the feedline. In comparison with a small coupling loop it is also mechanically complicated. ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John,
In principle, the coupling loop can be located in the same plane and anywhere within the main loop. So it is most convenient to locate it at the bottom of the main loop within an inch or two of the main loop. But make no direct connection between the two loops or between the coax and the main loop. There has to be some sort of support for the coax and coupling loop. So you can make use of the insulating jacket of the coax feedline and sticky insulating tape. If any other supporting insulating materials are needed any plastics will do. You can, of course, make a beautiful engineering job out of it which you can be proud of. But, radio-wise, the antenna will not work the slightest bit better. ;o) A comment about a motor-driven variable capacitor at the top of the main loop. To allow the main loop to maintain self-balance about ground, insert a multi-wire choke in the control wires and any other wires feeding the motor. Or whatever form the motor may take. Remember, the main loop should be allowed to take up its own natural balance about ground to reduce "radiation from the feedline." In the case of magloops, radiation from the feedline is a matter of loss of radiation from the antenna. Waste not, want not! ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This information will same me a lot of effort and mental anguish as I
proceed with my loop project. Thank you for your help. -- John, N9JG "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... John, In principle, the coupling loop can be located in the same plane and anywhere within the main loop. So it is most convenient to locate it at the bottom of the main loop within an inch or two of the main loop. But make no direct connection between the two loops or between the coax and the main loop. There has to be some sort of support for the coax and coupling loop. So you can make use of the insulating jacket of the coax feedline and sticky insulating tape. If any other supporting insulating materials are needed any plastics will do. You can, of course, make a beautiful engineering job out of it which you can be proud of. But, radio-wise, the antenna will not work the slightest bit better. ;o) A comment about a motor-driven variable capacitor at the top of the main loop. To allow the main loop to maintain self-balance about ground, insert a multi-wire choke in the control wires and any other wires feeding the motor. Or whatever form the motor may take. Remember, the main loop should be allowed to take up its own natural balance about ground to reduce "radiation from the feedline." In the case of magloops, radiation from the feedline is a matter of loss of radiation from the antenna. Waste not, want not! ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John,
I once had a magloop for 160 and 80 meters almost as big as the one you propose. It worked fine. According to predictions. Eventually, needing the garden space for other projects, I swapped it for a bottle of New Zealand white wine. But to reduce the weight of a 1.5-inch diameter copper-pipe conductor plus the tuning capacitor, the conductor was made of thin-wall, hard aluminium alloy known as Duralumin in these parts. (Pure aluminium is far too soft and is useless.) The loop was formed from three sections of tube which fitted into each other to make a complete circle. The curvature of the sections had to be formed in an engineering workshop. It needed three guy ropes and could be rotated about an angle of 90 degrees, five feet above ground level, inside a 2-inch diameter, cast iron tube sunk into the soil. There was an aluminium alloy vertical supporting tube which extended from below ground level almost to the highest point of the main loop and the motor-driven tuning capacitor. A vertical conductor, running diametrically across the main loop, has no effect on electrical performance. I had very good neighbours. Never had a single compaint about the wierd contraption which soared well above the skyline from my side of the 6-foot high bushes and trees which constituted the boundary between my property and theirs. It never occurred to me to request planning permission from the local authorities. With the assistance of a local Black Country radio friend, G3VFF, a born mechanical engineer, handicapped by an industrial accident, we just erected it! It helped, to my satisfaction, to prove the veracity of some of my radio software programs. John, I wish you all the very best with your project. ---- Cheers, Reg, G4FGQ. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Yaesu FT-857D questions | Equipment | |||
Loop antenna question | Shortwave |