Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, aRKay wrote: I just purchased a Ten-Tec 1208 Transverter to get my feet wet on six meters. I would like to use my existing W9INN fan dipole if possible. At the present time the fan dipole has three sets of wires from the common feed point for 40/80, 10 MHz and 18 MHz. My plan is to add another short set of wires cut for 50.125 MHz. Since each of the new wires will only be 4.67 feet, I plan to use stand offs and run them close to the 40/80 dipoles. It will be interesting to see if this really works. Any suggestions for the short stand off insulators? Dick, AA5VU aa5vu at arrl.net I have decided to hold off changing anything until I get the Transverter next week. I will then see if someone is close before I start messing with extra wires. The problem with adding another set of wires for 50.125 is how to keep them from getting tangled in the wind. I have visions of them wrapping around the 40/80 set of wires. Stay tuned for what happens. Half the fun of getting a new toy like the six meter transverter will be finding the right antenna. Dick aa5Vu |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "aRKay" wrote in message ... In article , wrote: The ringo ranger is vertical and most 6m stuff is horizontal. On skip that may not hurt but for local it's very poor. Allison KB1GMX Good response. I will not waste time messing with the old Ringo Ranger. Don't give up on the vertical too quickly. I use both a 6 meter dipole and a 6 meter J-pole, 90% of my 6 meter contacts have been with the J-pole. Some of the more experienced Hams of my acquaintance have told me that DX sort of works outside of the normal vertical/horizontal polarization expectation. I rarely have any occasion for a local 6 meter contact. so am not able to speak about that aspect of the 6 meter band. Harold KD5SAK |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Harold Burton" wrote: "aRKay" wrote in message ... In article , wrote: The ringo ranger is vertical and most 6m stuff is horizontal. On skip that may not hurt but for local it's very poor. Allison KB1GMX Good response. I will not waste time messing with the old Ringo Ranger. Don't give up on the vertical too quickly. I use both a 6 meter dipole and a 6 meter J-pole, 90% of my 6 meter contacts have been with the J-pole. Some of the more experienced Hams of my acquaintance have told me that DX sort of works outside of the normal vertical/horizontal polarization expectation. I rarely have any occasion for a local 6 meter contact. so am not able to speak about that aspect of the 6 meter band. Harold KD5SAK Thanks Harold. I forgot about the J-pole and I may try one while playing around with the new stuff. Dick - AA5VU |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 23:18:03 -0500, "Harold Burton"
wrote: "aRKay" wrote in message ... In article , wrote: The ringo ranger is vertical and most 6m stuff is horizontal. On skip that may not hurt but for local it's very poor. Allison KB1GMX Good response. I will not waste time messing with the old Ringo Ranger. Don't give up on the vertical too quickly. I use both a 6 meter dipole and a 6 meter J-pole, 90% of my 6 meter contacts have been with the J-pole. Some of the more experienced Hams of my acquaintance have told me that DX sort of works outside of the normal vertical/horizontal polarization expectation. I rarely have any occasion for a local 6 meter contact. so am not able to speak about that aspect of the 6 meter band. Harold KD5SAK Experience is that my vertical beam hears far less DX than the horizontal. Occasionally I hear DX on the Vertical that is better but on confirming the other end is also vertical. So it goes. I do have vertical for those times where it may help. One thing I do notice is the noise level of the vertical beam is far worse. For local use the horizontal is usually 2-3 Sunits higher than the vertical. Allison KB1GMX |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 03:55:02 GMT, aRKay wrote:
In article , aRKay wrote: I just purchased a Ten-Tec 1208 Transverter to get my feet wet on six meters. I would like to use my existing W9INN fan dipole if possible. At the present time the fan dipole has three sets of wires from the common feed point for 40/80, 10 MHz and 18 MHz. My plan is to add another short set of wires cut for 50.125 MHz. Since each of the new wires will only be 4.67 feet, I plan to use stand offs and run them close to the 40/80 dipoles. It will be interesting to see if this really works. Any suggestions for the short stand off insulators? I have one of those TT1208s and it's been a good tool for 6m. I have some impressive contacts off it and a 3 element beam. Enjoy it. Allison |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message Occasionally I hear DX on the Vertical that is better but on confirming the other end is also vertical. So it goes. I do have vertical for those times where it may help. One thing I do notice is the noise level of the vertical beam is far worse. For local use the horizontal is usually 2-3 Sunits higher than the vertical. Allison KB1GMX Before somebody tells you that polarization is unimportant for a skip signal, your 6 meter observations parallel what I found on 40. I had a 40 dipole and 40 GP vertical. In round table test with stations 400 - 800 miles away, people with verticals preferred my vertical, and people with dipoles preferred my dipole. There were a few people who could not tell the difference. Tam/WB2TT |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Allison, I have heard good things about the Ten Tec Transverter and figured it was time to give it a try. I am a RTTY Junkie and noticed a six meter RTTY spot yesterday. The 1208 should be here on Tuesday. Dick AA5VU The TT I had had a very hot receiver. I had the marage amplifier with the gasfet preamp and when I turned on the preamp I could not tell any differance in the weak signals. The S-meter came up but the noise came up with the signal. I could get the same effect in the audio just by turning up the volume on the receiver. On transmitt, 10 watts or so is still 10 watts. Just a little too low for me on 6 meters. With many of the newer rigs having 100 watts on 6 I think that is the power level to shoot for. For what is it , the transverter does a very fine job. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Handy Shortwave Chart | Info | |||
Handy Shortwave Chart | Info | |||
Handy Shortwave Chart | Info | |||
Handy Shortwave Chart | Info | |||
Handy Shortwave Chart | Info |