Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 16:20:40 -0000, Dave wrote:
there is no requirement that anyone listen to any broadcast radio. with the rapid growth of satellite radio there are even less people listening to either am of fm broadcast radio. add those who listen to cd's or dvd's and you get even less. The loss of listenership is not arguable. There are systems that are used for local road emergency notification, the 560khz one comes to mind, something along those lines would be the best bet, and add in signs on the backs of vehicles. i guess the real question is, what are you trying to do by overriding local broadcast stations? 1) to grab those that are listening to AM/FM, it is still a hyooge market, 2) client request, 3) DHS preference 4) the number of people alerted by a sign/sticker and independent warning channel is much less than both that and AM/FM, 5) the possibility that once the AM/FM FCC/NAB bond is broken, a precedent could be set for cell, sat, threading messaging, etc 6) spinoff tech for local/reg/national emergencies. and over what size area? 1 mile radius max from point of incident, less most probably. -- Drop the alphabet for email |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications? | General | |||
What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications? | Policy | |||
No anticipated changes in Morse Requeirement for a while | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | Policy | |||
Ham-radio is a hobby not a service | Policy |