Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 10th 05, 07:51 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:03:34 -0400, "Jim" wrote:

This isn't strictly a Ham question, but I hope you all can help me anyway.

I am using small transmitters in the 166-167 mhz range in some Box Turtle
research I am doing. My RDF antenna is a 3 element Yagi designed via
Yagicad 4.1 which works pretty well. It has 48db front/back and about 90
degrees beamwidth in the H pattern.

This works well for initial locating......usually starting 1500 to 2000 feet
from my transmitter, but the closer I get, the more inaccurate it becomes.

What kind of antenna design could I switch to when I get to close range that
would have a narrower beam so I could pinpint my target? It would be nice
to have something smaller than my 35" x 21" yagi for close in work, but the
beam width is the primary concern.

Yagicad doesn't let me design solely on beam width (at least I haven't
figured out how) so is there another way to go on this??

Thanks
Jim


You already got two good suggestions from others. Here's a third.
Build a MOXON square, less gain than yagi but if built right the MOXON
has a very distinct readward null, you exploit the null. Another
small advantage is it's smaller than a 2 element yagi for the same
band.

Allison



  #2   Report Post  
Old October 12th 05, 09:11 PM
Steve Nosko
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:03:34 -0400, "Jim" wrote:

...
You already got two good suggestions from others. Here's a third.
Build a MOXON square, less gain than yagi but if built right the MOXON
has a very distinct readward null, you exploit the null. Another
small advantage is it's smaller than a 2 element yagi for the same
band.

Allison

Look up the "Tape Measure Yagi" It is designed to have a null off the back,
but you'll have to adjust the center freq.
73, Steve, K,9.D.C'I





  #3   Report Post  
Old October 13th 05, 03:56 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:11:29 -0500, "Steve Nosko"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:03:34 -0400, "Jim" wrote:

...
You already got two good suggestions from others. Here's a third.
Build a MOXON square, less gain than yagi but if built right the MOXON
has a very distinct readward null, you exploit the null. Another
small advantage is it's smaller than a 2 element yagi for the same
band.

Allison

Look up the "Tape Measure Yagi" It is designed to have a null off the back,
but you'll have to adjust the center freq.
73, Steve, K,9.D.C'I


I've built both. The Tape measure yagi is not nearly as good off the
back and a bit larger. Moxon well done is an easy 35+ db null off
the back and sharper.



Allison
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SUPER J-POLE BEATS YAGI BY 1 dB [email protected] Antenna 76 February 10th 05 07:14 AM
GP -> yagi driven element? Dan Jacobson Antenna 0 February 7th 05 07:28 PM
Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc Richard Antenna 4 June 14th 04 01:48 PM
Quad vs Yagi (or log) Thierry Antenna 23 February 18th 04 08:38 PM
Remodelling commercial VHF yagi beams. Richard Antenna 2 February 14th 04 03:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017