Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Duncan wrote:
Jim wrote: This isn't strictly a Ham question, but I hope you all can help me anyway. I am using small transmitters in the 166-167 mhz range in some Box Turtle research I am doing. My RDF antenna is a 3 element Yagi designed via Yagicad 4.1 which works pretty well. It has 48db front/back and about 90 degrees beamwidth in the H pattern. This works well for initial locating......usually starting 1500 to 2000 feet from my transmitter, but the closer I get, the more inaccurate it becomes. What kind of antenna design could I switch to when I get to close range that would have a narrower beam so I could pinpint my target? It would be nice to have something smaller than my 35" x 21" yagi for close in work, but the beam width is the primary concern. Yagicad doesn't let me design solely on beam width (at least I haven't figured out how) so is there another way to go on this?? Thanks Jim The doppler shift method mentioned by Dave has worked very well for me but it only gives you a chioce between 2 directions. If you know the kind of area your turtles are likely to be then it should work otherwise you can use iyt in conjunction with you yagi antenna to get a accurate direction. The doppler shift method (unlike directional antennas) is not affected by signal strength. This is because it works by using two small antennas and determining which one the radio wave hits first (this type of device usually generates a tone which dissapears when the wave hits both antennas at the same time). This tells you with a good degree of accuracy that the transmitter is in front of or behind you. Let's not forget that the antenna on the turtle will not polarized in any particular fashion so antennas such as dopplers may not show nulls and may show peaks incorrectly. I would take a yagi that I can rotate to match the polarization to the source any day over TDOA or doppler type antennas. Also I would always favor hunting the peak versus the null especially if any reflections are present. If you are having problems with a full sized yagi is it due to equipment limitations or to physical constaints such as vegetation? 73, Larry, W0QE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SUPER J-POLE BEATS YAGI BY 1 dB | Antenna | |||
GP -> yagi driven element? | Antenna | |||
Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc | Antenna | |||
Quad vs Yagi (or log) | Antenna | |||
Remodelling commercial VHF yagi beams. | Antenna |