Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "chuck" wrote in message ink.net... Good info, Owen. I think the EIA test procedures really have FM or AM in mind, rather than SSB or, what is exactly the same for SINAD purposes, CW. The 60% figure just doesn't apply to SSB or CW. You would simply use an unmodulated signal generator with the frequency offset to produce a 1 kHz tone in the receiver's audio output, preferrably centered in the receiver's passband. Then a measure of rms af voltage at the receiver's output with and without the 1 kHz filter would be made. We don't hear much about SINAD testing procedures for SSB and CW. Even the ARRL's test procedure manual glosses over the procedure for other than FM. The old Canadian Department of Communications Document RSS 125 Issue 1, Released August 1st, 1976, precisely describes the method of SINAD measurements for SSB equipment. In the past 25 years or so, HP's distortion analyzers (such as the HP8903B) were used for this measurement. In the late 60s and early 70s I have seen Heathkit distortion analyzers used for SINAD measurements. The latest versions of RSS125 seem to be more in line with FCC standards, where receiver specifications are not required for certification purposes (See http://www.agiletestgroup.com/ICCertifications.html). 73, Frank |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SINAD Measurements | Equipment | |||
Which one is a better scanner and why? | Scanner | |||
Yaesu VR-500 (updated) | Swap | |||
Yaesu VR-500 | Swap | |||
FS: MINT AOR AR-8600 Scanner/Receiver | Swap |