Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nope. See my previous post.
A square wave has an average equal to the RMS equal to the peak. It's just like DC. The "older types" RESPOND to average of a SINE (63% of peak) but display the value for the RMS (71% of peak), so they have a 1.11 correction factor to get from average to RMS. 73, Steve, K,9.D;C'I "chuck" wrote in message ink.net... Hello Owen, Seems both average-responding and trms meters use rectifiers, so a square wave input with perfect symmetry should result in BOTH meters reading the same: an amount equal to the peak square wave voltage. Am I confused on this? Chuck Owen Duffy wrote: On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 03:09:11 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote: So, theoretically: - an ideal average responding meter should read (1-2/pi)% which is 36.3% or 8.8dB on an perfect square wave; I think this is close to the right answer, but for the wrong reason. I think it needs to be evaluated iteratively, and I get an answer closer to 34.3% or 9.3dB. Owen -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SINAD Measurements | Equipment | |||
Which one is a better scanner and why? | Scanner | |||
Yaesu VR-500 (updated) | Swap | |||
Yaesu VR-500 | Swap | |||
FS: MINT AOR AR-8600 Scanner/Receiver | Swap |