Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Help identifying tiny coax
I came across a spool of some very small coax in the hopes that it could be
used in 802.11 but now not a clue of what it is. It is on a Raychem reel. The Description tag says 5028A1318-0 440086. As best I can measure it is 0.075 inch OD, 0.055 braid diameter, 0.040 insulation OD and the center conductor measures 0.015. The outer jacket is black and the inner insulation is tan in color. The braid is very dense fine wire as is the center conductor. It looks and feels like high quality stuff. Any help or even a good guess appreciated. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Help identifying tiny coax
a quick visit to raychem.com finds this:
http://catalog.tycoelectronics.com/T...18-0&LG=1&I=13 "edard" wrote in message ... I came across a spool of some very small coax in the hopes that it could be used in 802.11 but now not a clue of what it is. It is on a Raychem reel. The Description tag says 5028A1318-0 440086. As best I can measure it is 0.075 inch OD, 0.055 braid diameter, 0.040 insulation OD and the center conductor measures 0.015. The outer jacket is black and the inner insulation is tan in color. The braid is very dense fine wire as is the center conductor. It looks and feels like high quality stuff. Any help or even a good guess appreciated. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Help identifying tiny coax
Dave wrote:
a quick visit to raychem.com finds this: http://catalog.tycoelectronics.com/T...18-0&LG=1&I=13 Wow Dave thanks. Who would have thought of trying Raychem? Duhhh |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Help identifying tiny coax
This sounds similar to some cable I got surplus a number of years ago.
The loss was surprisingly high at 7 MHz. I'm quite sure the reason is that the center conductor is made from several strands of very fine copper-clad steel wire. Although the copper is probably a sizeable fraction of the overall wire thickness, it's still thin in terms of skin depth at the lower part of the HF region because of the very small strand diameter. Consequently, significant current flows in the steel, which is very much more resistive than copper at HF. Loss at VHF is about what you'd expect from a copper center wire. So I recommend checking the loss before using the cable at HF if loss might be important to the application. I used it as low-weight feedline for Field Day (I generally backpack my FD gear), and was prepared to accept the loss I thought it would have as a trade for the low weight. But I found the loss to be considerably greater than expected. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Help identifying tiny coax
he mentioned use for 802.11 so low freq stuff shouldn't be a problem.
"Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... This sounds similar to some cable I got surplus a number of years ago. The loss was surprisingly high at 7 MHz. I'm quite sure the reason is that the center conductor is made from several strands of very fine copper-clad steel wire. Although the copper is probably a sizeable fraction of the overall wire thickness, it's still thin in terms of skin depth at the lower part of the HF region because of the very small strand diameter. Consequently, significant current flows in the steel, which is very much more resistive than copper at HF. Loss at VHF is about what you'd expect from a copper center wire. So I recommend checking the loss before using the cable at HF if loss might be important to the application. I used it as low-weight feedline for Field Day (I generally backpack my FD gear), and was prepared to accept the loss I thought it would have as a trade for the low weight. But I found the loss to be considerably greater than expected. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Help identifying tiny coax
Hey, that stuff might be great to use as an attenuator between an HF
radio and a transverter...hmmm.... Scott N0EDV Roy Lewallen wrote: This sounds similar to some cable I got surplus a number of years ago. The loss was surprisingly high at 7 MHz. I'm quite sure the reason is that the center conductor is made from several strands of very fine copper-clad steel wire. Although the copper is probably a sizeable fraction of the overall wire thickness, it's still thin in terms of skin depth at the lower part of the HF region because of the very small strand diameter. Consequently, significant current flows in the steel, which is very much more resistive than copper at HF. Loss at VHF is about what you'd expect from a copper center wire. So I recommend checking the loss before using the cable at HF if loss might be important to the application. I used it as low-weight feedline for Field Day (I generally backpack my FD gear), and was prepared to accept the loss I thought it would have as a trade for the low weight. But I found the loss to be considerably greater than expected. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Some coax experitments. | Scanner | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |