| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:35:39 -0500, Steve Nosko wrote:
The singular (implied plural) was well accepted. 100 kc Go up 3 kc, please It is _not_ a pluralization. It is k(ilo)c(cycles-per-)s(econd). The scientific notation for "X per Z" is "X/Z". Ergo, "cycles per second" (cps) is "c/s". Thousand(s) of cycles per second is "kc/s". The crude shorthand commonly used in ham radio is (was) "kcs"(, or "mcs") -- probably due to morse code usage influence. The pedantic argument back in the Olde Days was that a QSL card confirming a QSO on "7180 kc" was wrong. (Just as "73s" on the same QSL card was {and still is} "wrong".) "7180 kc" is seven million one hundred and eighty thousand cycles. Period. It could be 2 cycles today, 17 tomorrow, 6 the day after, 400 next week -- and, so on until the total number of cycles are accumulated. It's not until the "per Unit Of Time" is specified that we have a _frequency_ . (But, then, I think the QSL card should've stated "41.783 Meter Wavelength".) Jonesy -- Marvin L Jones | jonz | W3DHJ | linux Pueblo, Colorado | @ | Jonesy | OS/2 __ 38.24N 104.55W | config.com | DM78rf | SK |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| 80m Inverted L Initial measurements | Antenna | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| Resonant and Non-resonant Radials | Antenna | |||
| hustler antenna | Antenna | |||