LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old November 7th 05, 07:07 PM
John Ferrell
 
Posts: n/a
Default 135' flattop

That makes sense to me!

Thanks for the correction.
A bold but incorrect position frequently provokes some one who knows
to reveal the correct answers...

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:33:54 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:

John Ferrell W8CCW

Your deduction is not 100% valid. 1/4WL can be a BIG problem and
worst case for matching.

I guess MFJ is technically correct but confusing. For instance,
assume a 50 ohm antenna and 1/4WL of 600 ohm open-wire line. The
"resonant" impedance seen looking into the feedline would be 7200
ohms, outside the matching range for a lot of MFJ tuners. Half a
century ago, we called that the "anti-resonant" point (akin to a
parallel resonant impedance). Most amateur radio operators should
substitute 1/2WL for 1/4WL in the above MFJ manual quote to avoid
thinking 1/4WL is "no problem".



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017