Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() An outside loop works very well for nulling the noise and still allowing you to hear the weak stations. In most if not all of the ARRL Antenna Books, there is a chapter on a 160 meter receiving loop, you can just scale this back for 80m. I dont have the book here now, I think the lenght was something like 25' or so for 160m. It is made out of a 75 ohm piece of coax that goes around once, connected to a air variable cap. The braid of the coax is cut at a certain point in the loop. Its not that big at all even on 160m and can be put up on a pole and turned by hand or even by a small TV type rotor. On 160m with terrible local power line noise I was able to hear many stations including DX stations on the loop that I could never hear on my Inverted L transmitting antenna on 160m. 73s Craig N0BSA |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is the situation: have an inverted V for 80m and noise level is
S9.. Not good really.... Dunno...Sounds like it was working to me. I did the next logical step and tryied magnetic loop for 80, reciving only, indoors. What are you trying to hear? Sounds kinda illogical to me, if you are working NVIS... :/ What would you do in this situation? Loop, magnetic loop, dipole, short beverage perhaps??? I'd go back to what was working. The dipole. If the noise is from the shack, the use of baluns or chokes to decouple the feedline can be used. But I think the noise you heard was the normal atmospheric noise you would hear on 80m. I often get S 8-9 noise levels on 75 until winter really kicks in. It's normal. Noise is normal. It's RF. I'd be more worried about *not* hearing any noise, than I would be hearing it. Also, don't lay the antenna on the roof. The higher you can get away from it, the better. A loop will be no better than the dipole in general. Both are about equally efficient if fed with coax. But the loop is more wire, and more work.. ![]() On 75m NVIS, almost all signals will be over the noise, unless you have a local T storm brewing...Noise is not an issue...Well, not to the ones with decent antennas... To one using a full size dipole fed with coax, even 100w is plenty to get over 95% of the noise you will run into. An S 9 noise level is no big deal if the signals are 20-40 over 9. And this is the norm.. Only the guys running funky gimmick antennas will be hard to hear.. :/ There are some weird ideas around about noise... Almost as many fairy tales as with grounds and shielded loops.. ![]() Good antennas pick up noise. That is what they are designed to do. After all, noise is just rf like any other signal. If the antenna is "low" noise, that usually means it's half crippled in some way, unless the noise is ingress from the shack. :/ And thats from the lack of a balun, choke, etc at the feedpoint. Easily cured. Just rolling a few turns of coax into a choke can reduce much of it. But like I say, I think your noise was normal band noise. Listen now, after the cold front blew through the country. I bet it's a tad quieter on that dipole now. MK |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
'Crackling' Noise on HF Band | Shortwave | |||
Icom 746pro Testimonial | Shortwave | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Homebrew | |||
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE | Shortwave |