On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:16:08 -0800, Dan Richardson wrote:

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 03:07:10 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote:

I often hear Rules of Thumb (ROT) like VSWR 3 is OK for coax and
25 if fine for open wire, or the converse... but something is lost in
the brief expression of those ROTs, and it seems more and more the
knowledge base of our hobby is the ROTs, rather than the underlying
principles. There is an appeal to the new experts in our hobby to
pickup the ROTs and parrot them... perhaps we need to take the time to
qualify what we say where learners are listening.

Owen

Owen,

The problem is that knowing the SWR is not worth much without knowing
the frequency and the spec's of the transmission line.

.... including the length. I agree fully.

Owen
--

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 03:40:33 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote:

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:16:08 -0800, Dan Richardson wrote:

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 03:07:10 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote:

I often hear Rules of Thumb (ROT) like VSWR 3 is OK for coax and
25 if fine for open wire, or the converse... but something is lost in
the brief expression of those ROTs, and it seems more and more the
knowledge base of our hobby is the ROTs, rather than the underlying
principles. There is an appeal to the new experts in our hobby to
pickup the ROTs and parrot them... perhaps we need to take the time to
qualify what we say where learners are listening.

Owen

Owen,

The problem is that knowing the SWR is not worth much without knowing
the frequency and the spec's of the transmission line.

... including the length. I agree fully.

Owen

Yep, I forgot to add that.

Thanks

Danny, K6MHE

email: k6mheatarrldotnet
http://www.k6mhe.com/