| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 01:59:05 -0800, "Joel Kolstad"
wrote: It certainly looks well-constructed, but I'd have a lot more confidence in Cantenna's products if they had measured (or even simulated) radiation patterns and calculations. They also don't mention their feed arrangement which could make a huge difference in actual performance. For a few dollars more, you can get real commercial antennas. My internet service comes to me via a 7 mile hop using a PCI card or WGB external box running 100mw. Works great, giving me better than 1/3 T-1 connection. When I swing the antenna around, I see all of my ISP's APs, including one 35 miles away in the next state. I've got a few links if you need them. I just went through them and see that some have changed, but there's lots of stuff out there for WiFi. Your main worry is the antenna connector, if you are running a PCMCIA card. Gary -- Replace x in adr with c |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| What SWR range is acceptable? | Antenna | |||
| Antenna Range Testing. | Antenna | |||
| Extending range of wireless motion sensor | Antenna | |||
| Extend range of wireless motion sensor | Antenna | |||
| RF Problems | Antenna | |||