Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Roy, I prefer my radiation patterns to be functions of the antenna itself. After all, that's what it's all about. To determine the field strength at a distance I prefer not to take any notice of Eznec's misleading ideas on the state of the ionosphere or groundwave loss and do my own calculations. Or I can follow up Eznec by using a program dedicated to either groundwave or ionospheric propagation. I agree preferences will differ. But it is important to understand exactly what radiation patterns do or do not mean. Please do not take this note as any criticism of Eznec. It is a valuable (and free) calculating resource. But, as you demonstrate, it is difficult to describe in a few words exactly what it does. Please simplify! ---- Reg. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Cold Water Pipe Ground? | Antenna | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
Grounding Rod | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |