Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I have a matching circuit that matches 50 Ohms to 4500 Ohms in parallel with 2.5pF at 45MHz. The coil was measured at 147nH with a Q of 50 at 45 MHz. The circuit is a C-Tap typology with following values. Tap input to ground = 784pF Tap to hot side of coil = 92pF Par inductor = 147nH My design calculations predict Loaded Q = 26 and BW = 1.7 MHz. I used a 50p trimmer in par with 68pF cap for top of tap to fine tune. A 4k7 resistor and 2p2 cap were placed across the output to simulate the correct load. The test results show BW = 1.7 MHz and Loaded Q = 24.7 (agree with calculated values). When installed on the IF front end, the expected sensitivity is achieved when tuned. This would indicate most of the signal must be getting through or sensitivity would be effected due to mismatch. All seems to look ok but when I attach the MJF-269 Analyzer I get impedance of 280 angle 35 degrees (240 -j 179) for the impedance, I get SWR = 6.1 , return loss of 2.8dB and match efficiency of 48%. I cannot understand why there is such a discrepency between the design values and tested results (using sig gen, spectrum analyzer and power meter) compared to the MJF-269. Is there something I am doing wrong here or is it a mis-interpretation of displayed values ? Thanks for any help. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Tektronix 497P 100 Hz-21 GHz spectrum analyzer | Equipment | |||
Sangean Problems? | Shortwave | |||
problems reading W3UHF's icomclassic site, too much 'script' | Boatanchors |