Gene Fuller wrote:
I don't understand the "sour grapes" reference. To the contrary, I
believe I have argued with you many times that there are multiple ways
to solve a problem.

Actually, you have gone from saying I was wrong to saying that I am
right but it doesn't matter. I guess that's an improvement. :-)

Your original message implied that may be some special benefit to a
*standing-wave* antenna over a *non-standing-wave* antenna.

Sorry, I never said anything about a standing-wave antenna having some
special benefit over a traveling-wave antenna. It was a problem with
the inferrence function, not with the implication function. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp