Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 19th 06, 02:04 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
 
Posts: n/a
Default HF-Ground

Question:

Is you are making a HF-ground (radials just below the surface) Should
these radials be insulated or not?

73 John

  #3   Report Post  
Old January 19th 06, 03:00 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
John, N9JG
 
Posts: n/a
Default HF-Ground

To cut down on copper corrosion, I use enameled #14 magnet wire.

"Bob Miller" wrote in message
...
On 19 Jan 2006 06:04:29 -0800, wrote:

Question:

Is you are making a HF-ground (radials just below the surface) Should
these radials be insulated or not?

73 John


In one of my antenna books, by W6SAI, he recommended uninsulated wire
for buried radials.

bob
k5qwg



  #4   Report Post  
Old January 19th 06, 03:02 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Dan Richardson
 
Posts: n/a
Default HF-Ground

On 19 Jan 2006 06:04:29 -0800, John wrote:

Question:

Is you are making a HF-ground (radials just below the surface) Should
these radials be insulated or not?


It makes no real noticeable difference in operation, however,
insulated wire will not deteriorate as fast in the ground.

Danny, K6MHE




email: k6mheatarrldotnet
http://www.k6mhe.com/
  #6   Report Post  
Old January 19th 06, 09:05 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Owen Duffy
 
Posts: n/a
Default HF-Ground

On 19 Jan 2006 16:28:53 GMT, "Bill Turner" wrote:

wrote:

Question:

Is you are making a HF-ground (radials just below the surface) Should
these radials be insulated or not?

73 John

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Insulated will reduce corrosion. Don't bury them any deeper than
necessary. Lying on top of the ground is better. Dirt is not a good
antenna element.


Bill, I often see the assertion that it is better to not bury radials.

Can you point me to any reputable texts or experimental evidence that
shows the difference between shallow buried radials and radials lying
"on top of the ground"?

Corrosion is often cited as a reason to use insulated buried radials,
but is corrosion a significant risk in most locations. We widely use
buried copper water pipes here, and copper clad earthing electrodes
for the MEN power supply earthing, yet they don't seem to suffer
significant corrosion in most places.

It seems to me that insulated buried radials are likely to be less
effective in a lightning protection role.

Owen
--
  #7   Report Post  
Old January 20th 06, 02:08 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Bill Turner
 
Posts: n/a
Default HF-Ground

Owen Duffy wrote:

Bill, I often see the assertion that it is better to not bury radials.

Can you point me to any reputable texts or experimental evidence that
shows the difference between shallow buried radials and radials lying
"on top of the ground"?

Corrosion is often cited as a reason to use insulated buried radials,
but is corrosion a significant risk in most locations. We widely use
buried copper water pipes here, and copper clad earthing electrodes
for the MEN power supply earthing, yet they don't seem to suffer
significant corrosion in most places.

It seems to me that insulated buried radials are likely to be less
effective in a lightning protection role.

Owen

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Your mind is already made up. Do as you like.

Bill, W6WRT
  #8   Report Post  
Old January 20th 06, 02:51 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Owen Duffy
 
Posts: n/a
Default HF-Ground

On 20 Jan 2006 02:08:57 GMT, "Bill Turner" wrote:

Owen Duffy wrote:

Bill, I often see the assertion that it is better to not bury radials.

Can you point me to any reputable texts or experimental evidence that
shows the difference between shallow buried radials and radials lying
"on top of the ground"?

Corrosion is often cited as a reason to use insulated buried radials,
but is corrosion a significant risk in most locations. We widely use
buried copper water pipes here, and copper clad earthing electrodes
for the MEN power supply earthing, yet they don't seem to suffer
significant corrosion in most places.

It seems to me that insulated buried radials are likely to be less
effective in a lightning protection role.

Owen

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Your mind is already made up. Do as you like.


I note that you decline to subtantiate the reasons underlying your
advice.

Has anyone references to sound evidence that supports Bill's advice
that radials "Lying on top of the ground is better." than buried.

Owen
--
  #9   Report Post  
Old January 20th 06, 03:22 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
David G. Nagel
 
Posts: n/a
Default HF-Ground

Owen Duffy wrote:
On 20 Jan 2006 02:08:57 GMT, "Bill Turner" wrote:


Owen Duffy wrote:


Bill, I often see the assertion that it is better to not bury radials.

Can you point me to any reputable texts or experimental evidence that
shows the difference between shallow buried radials and radials lying
"on top of the ground"?

Corrosion is often cited as a reason to use insulated buried radials,
but is corrosion a significant risk in most locations. We widely use
buried copper water pipes here, and copper clad earthing electrodes
for the MEN power supply earthing, yet they don't seem to suffer
significant corrosion in most places.

It seems to me that insulated buried radials are likely to be less
effective in a lightning protection role.

Owen


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Your mind is already made up. Do as you like.



I note that you decline to subtantiate the reasons underlying your
advice.

Has anyone references to sound evidence that supports Bill's advice
that radials "Lying on top of the ground is better." than buried.

Owen
--


Owen;

Given the expertise that Bill has accumulated over the years and the
good advise he has given to anyone who asks I think that your attitude
needs modification. When you were in school did you challenge your
teachers this way? I think not. If you diagreed you kept it to your self
or checked it out on your own.
For what it's worth everything that I have read tends towards placing
the radials on the open ground, usually staked down so as to prevent
tripping or getting caught in a lawn mower.


Dave WD9BDZ

Note to Bill: I know you don't need anyone to defend you but this guy
isn't going to take any answer from anyone. I suggest that we drop him
as a thread. I just know his response is going to be at me demanding
positive confirmation. ;^)..
  #10   Report Post  
Old January 23rd 06, 10:22 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
 
Posts: n/a
Default HF-Ground

Your mind is already made up. Do as you like.

I note that you decline to substantiate the reasons underlying your advice.
Hello sir, maybe YOU should nip in the yard with a shovel and some wire
(don't forget your strippers) and do some tests yourself! old man




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Building a Solid Copper Ground Pipe {Tube} with an Solid Iron Core. - Also - Water Drilling a Solid Copper Pipe for a Ground Rod. RHF Shortwave 12 January 17th 06 07:39 PM
Transforming your simple Ground Rod into a Ground Anchor : Is It Worth The Work ? - You Decide ! RHF Shortwave 10 December 24th 05 10:09 PM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ darla General 0 July 22nd 04 12:14 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017