| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Opinions of the many individuals depend on geographic lattitude, World
population densities, what bands happen to be favourites, G5RV's and how much money there is in the bank. Let's try to remove these distracting factors. I'll put it in somewhat different "simplistic" terms. Everything else being equal, the deciding factors are geometry and trigonometry. The performance of a dipole is better at elevation angles greater than about 45 degrees and the performance of a vertical is better at lower angles. That's because the vertical and horizontal antenna types are oriented at 90 degrees to each other. At elevation angles around 45 degrees performance is about the same for both types. The ground path distance corresponding to 45 degrees depends on height of the ionospheric reflecting layers. Layer height depends on which layer, mainly E or F2, day or night, summer or winter, and the solar sunspot cycle. (None of these important factors are taken into account by antenna modelling programs. Propagation prediction programs DO take them into account but, with them, geometry is also an essential factor.) The range of distances at which vertical and horizontal antennas have similar performances in daylight is from 140 miles (E-layer) to 500 miles (F2-layer), which falls to 370 miles at night. But what decides whether a transmiiting antenna will be used or not is NOT the distance to the receiver - it is the MUF (maximum usable frequency) The MUF is geometrically-derived which increases with distance and with a decreasing elevation angle. It also changes with geographical lattitude and sun angle. With the F2-layer the MUF can increase by 3 times the vertical critical frequency Fcrit. Thus, by using a vertical low-angle antenna there are more bands and potentially more listeners available. Fcrit is the highest frequency which is reflected from a layer at vertical incidence. At higher frequencies the wave passes straight through. The MUF for high radiation angles and short distances is therefore low. It does not increase very fast as the radiation angle falls. It varies with night and day and the solar 11-year cycle. For the E-layer in summer daylight Fcrit is about 3.5 MHz. For the F2-layer in summer daylight it is about 6.5 MHz and about 5.5 MHz at night. On winter nights Fcrit for the F2-layer is about 3.5 MHz. Fcrit and high angle MUF's are subject to variation due to solar activity. But in general only the 80m and 160m bands, and sometimes 40m, are open for short distance rag-chews. This restricts the advantages of high-angle horizontal dipoles. Finally, a horizontal dipole radiates best when broadside on. Unless it is rotateable it has weaknesses in its service area. If I had to choose, I'd always choose a half-wave 80m vertical in preference to a half-wave dipole. ---- Reg. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Grounding | Shortwave | |||
| Mostly horizontal polarization of HF arriving at my antenna? | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas | Antenna | |||