Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Verticals versus Horizontal Dipoles
There is much discussion about the relative merits of the simple
vertical versus horizontal dipole antennas. Their radiation patterns are well known. They are very broad in both the vertical and horizontal planes. Both have have a null. We need consider only the broadside, maximum, radiation from a dipole. Most of the arguments can be settled by considering the elevation angle of the path taken by the radio wave between the transmitting and receiving stations. Followed by a little elementary geometry or trigonometry. For present purposes a flat Earth can be assumed. At an elevation angle of around 45 degrees the strength of radiation received from vertical and horizontal antennas are about equal. (This has nothing to do with Eznec take-off angles.) The heights of the Ionospheric reflecting layers are - E-layer = 70 miles, daylight only. F1-layer = 140 miles, occasionally, in daylight only. F2-layer = 190 miles, night-time. F2-layer = 250 miles, in daylight. From flat-Earth geometry, at an elevation angle of 45 degrees, the distance between transmitting and receiving stations is twice the height of the reflecting layer. Therefore, at this distance the received signal strength can be expected to be about the same from both types of antenna. As the elevation angle decreases, the distance increases and radiation from the vertical antenna increases. The radiation from the dipole decreases. There is an extra propagation loss due to an increase in radio path length but this equally affects radiation from both antenna types. As the elevation angle increases towards the vertical, distance decreases, radiation from the dipole increases and radiation from the vertical antenna decreases in strength. The radio path loss decreases but the difference in pattern between the two antenna types is maintained at the receiver. With a spherical Earth, in daylight, using the F2-layer, at elevation angles around 5 degrees, one-hop distances of 3,500 miles can occur. With two hops, at angles of around 12 degrees, distances of 5,000 miles can occur. For each additional hop there is loss in the layer and loss in the reflection in the ground. Some parts of the radio path may be in daylight and others in darkness. More than one layer may be involved. Muli-path distortion occurs. Peculiar things happen and much depends on frequency. The low-angle performance of a half-wave dipole, even when radiating broadside towards the receiver, is very poor in comparison with a simple vertical. On the other hand, a simple vertical does reasonably well when working just across county because of the short propagation path, almost straight up and down again, or even via the groundwave for very short distances. ---- Reg, G4FGQ. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
Mostly horizontal polarization of HF arriving at my antenna? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas | Antenna |