Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 22:59:52 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: Nobody's books or publications are bibles. Not even Terman's or B.L & E's. Indeed, Reg. It's always struck me as rather annoying that there are more errors in books on electronics than in any other published subject _bar none_ to my knowledge. I can think of no text book that is entirely error-free with the _possible_ exception of Art of Electronics. Most of the errors in radio & electronics tomes are related to ambiguous authoring, but there is a regrettably large number of outright errors (examples calculations or fundamental misunderstanding on the part of the writer) that are utterly poisonous snake oil to the unwitting and unguided student. Chris Bowick's 'RF Circuit Design' springs to mind here! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Of Asteroids and Dinosaurs | Policy | |||
New Smith Chart Program - "SmartSmith" | Antenna | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Could This Be The Solution? | Policy | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |