Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Lewallen" wrote: A physically small inductor such as a toroid will function exactly the same in both cases. (I limited it to being physically small, since a larger inductor will interact with the antenna's field.) You're missing the point, Roy. It indeed does function the same way in both cases but if there are reflections present, your lumped circuit analysis rules are known to fail.Your analysis of both cases may be equally wrong in both cases. What is the traveling wave current delay through the coil in degrees? That's easy to measure. That current delay is the degrees that the coil supplies to the antenna. You can ignore any measurements involving standing wave current as being essentially meaningless. What is important is the traveling- wave current delay through the coil. Please measure it and report what it is for your 'physically small toroid'. Your lumped circuit analysis pre-assumes a zero delay through the coil. That delay is certainly not zero in the real world. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |