Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... Cecil Moore wrote: I will accept what you find as long as long as the method to obtain the results is valid.. Roy's earlier measurements are virtually meaningless since he was measuring standing wave current which doesn't even flow (phase is constant and fixed around zero degrees). Shame on you for measuring current that doesn't flow through a current transformer. Standing wave net current doesn't flow back and forth along the wire. That's why they call it a *standing* wave. Why don't you know that already? At any point on the wire, the H-fields and E-fields are exchanging energy at the frequency of operation. That's certainly enough reason for an inductive pickup to respond. Why is that a surprise to you or Roy? Because you two mistakenly thought net standing wave current flows and ignorantly measured it? All you measured was the orthogonal exchange of energy between the two fields. Nothing was moving except the underlying forward and reflected currents. Isn't this stuff taught anymore? What have you guys done - gotten together and elected yourselves into a club of omniscient gurus? Please take a look at the laws of reflection physics. It appears that you are ignorant of most of them. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |