Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wes Stewart wrote:
Why do you persist at doing this? My post was in response to someone else and you feel it necessary to jump in with the same old bafflegab. This is a public forum. Why do you not respond to my posting on a technical level instead of resorting to an ad hominem attack? I have tons of technical references to support my position. Clearly, you were too busy trying to frame an argument to actually read what I wrote. I only respond to portions I disagree with, Wes. Why can't you and I have a simple, point by point, technical discussion? "We" need to plot no such thing. You may have such a need; I do not. You, nor your cohorts, are likely to understand what's really happening until you take a look at the individual underlying currents that superpose to form the standing wave current which doesn't flow at all since its phase angle is fixed at zero degrees. Isn't a bunch of IEEE PhD's saying that "the lumped-circuit model fails in a standing-wave environment", enough evidence for you to consider that they know what they are talking about? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |