Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Tom, W8JI wrote: "You have consistently disagreed with me when I said the time delay through an inductor with tight mutual coupling from turn to turn is somewhat close to light speed over the physical length of the inductor, rather than the time it rakes to wind its way around the copper." That contradicts established experience. Tom seems to be confusing the effects of the E-field with the effects of the H-field. The E-field propagates at the speed of light through a coil. The H-field propagates at the speed of light through a capacitor. Make the turns coupling as tight as you can, the current is still delayed by 90-degrees. Can the actual current phase delay be estimated knowing the Q of the coil? I don't recall a formula for that. Now, it surely is possible to bypass a perfect inductor with a capacitor to mitigate a delay. Dang Richard, now you've told Tom how to run his experiment in order to obtain the results he predicts. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |