wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Now, it surely is possible to bypass a perfect inductor with a capacitor
to mitigate a delay.
Dang Richard, now you've told Tom how to run his experiment
in order to obtain the results he predicts. :-)

You say you will accept something, you ask for something to be done,
and when it is offered you back up and stall, preparing advance excuses
why it won't be done correctly and refusing to make a prediction.

You've eaten up hours of my time and the only thing I've learned is you
don't want to learn, and you are so unsure of yourself you'll avoid any
prediction of how something will work any way you can.

I'm just amazed you have to fall back on name calling, mubo-jumbo, and
inuendo when someone offers to help you understand something. I'm all
done with this too.

That's exactly what he did back in November 2003. I see he hasn't
changed any. Wonder who the next person will be to get sucked in, jerked
around, and disgusted.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Roy Lewallen wrote:
That's exactly what he did back in November 2003. I see he hasn't
changed any. Wonder who the next person will be to get sucked in, jerked
around, and disgusted.

Here comes the junk yard dog guru gang. Tom has refused
to give me the necessary needed information about his
coil and his measurement configuration and you are blaming
me for that? With the information that he has provided
so far, I might as well be trying to guess how much
loose change he has in his pocket.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp