wrote:
I wrote and all can read:

Everyone please take a close look at the lengths to which
Tom will go to to deceive the readers. He has falsified
the following postings. He mixed and matched, cut and
pasted, from multiple postings made at different times
for the sole purpose of deceiving. That cannot happen
accidentally. That is a deliberately unethical act, a
lie about what I posted, and is probably criminal.

Please observe to what lengths Tom is willing to go to
divert the technical issues and hide the technical truth
in order to protect his lumped-circuit myths.

Here's is the entire posting: Where did Tom give the coil length?
************************************************** ****************
wrote:

I have a 100 turn 2" diameter #18 gauge wire air core inductor. There
are 100 turns, so there is about 630 inches or 32 feet of wire in the
coil.

I have a Network Analyzer with port to port time delay measurement
capability. It measures coaxial cables very well, and even clip leads.

Cecil, please predict or guess the group delay of this inductor at 3.8
MHz. Tell us all what that group delay means for your wave theory.

Tom, I have no idea since you chose not to post the length of
the coil or the inductance of the coil or the Q of the coil
or even the turns/inch of the coil.

Is your Network Analyzer equipped with current probes? If not,
you are wasting your time.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
************************************************** **************************
Fri, Mar 10 2006 9:13 pm
Email:
Groups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Cecil,

The posting I replied to was the following made at 7:34pm which
did not contain the length of the coil. I read this one first and
replied to it. It is absolutely true that Tom chose not to post
the length of the coil in the 7:34pm posting to which I replied.

Tom wrote at 7:34pm:
I have a 100 turn 2" diameter #18 gauge wire air core inductor. There
are 100 turns, so there is about 630 inches or 32 feet of wire in the
coil.

See? The length of the coil is NOT there.

The following quote is from Tom's *second* posting made at 8:13pm,
almost half an hour later. His *first* posting didn't say how
long the coil was. I read Tom's *first* posting first and replied
to it before I read his second posting.

Tom wrote at 8:13pm:
I have a 100 turn 2 inch diameter air wound inductor of pretty good
quality. It is 10 inches long.

To which Cecil Moore replied:

Tom, I have no idea since you chose not to post the length of
the coil or the inductance of the coil or the Q of the coil
or even the turns/inch of the coil.

That quote is my reply to Tom's *first* posting. I had
not read your *second* posting yet. Everything I said was
absolutely true about his first posting.

How unethical can one get? Tom cut and pasted multiple postings
from different times to try to deceive the readers. Not only is
it unethical but it is probably also illegal.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp