Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Popelish wrote:
Dang! I was looking forward to your test results, and a description of your test method. I think your 2" diameter coil is a good example of an inductor that is neither a perfect "lump" nor a pure transmission line. That's what my back of the napkin calculations would indicate. I get ~14 degrees at 1.9 MHz or ~28 degrees at 3.8 MHz based on 90 degrees at 12 MHz. But based on what these guys measured before, anyone would be a fool to predict the results without knowing what the test setup looks like. In fact, the prediction challenge was a blatently obvious attempt to lead the unsuspecting down a primrose path without a roadmap. Do you think W7EL would ever make a prediction based on the meager amount of information provided? :-) A few years ago he provided some information but kept changing parameters daily until I got tired and withdrew my estimate. But it turned out in the end that I was pretty close. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |