Cecil Moore wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote:

The record is readily available via groups.google.com for anyone
interested in seeing what really happened. The thread was "Current in
antenna loading coils controversy (long)", in November 2003.


At that time in 2003, I was as naive as Galileo in front
of the court run by religious priests.

Any time you feel like apologizing for your questionable
behavior, all I ask is that you retract that single
"gobbledygook" statement that you made against my use of
the rules of the distributed-network model and laws of
reflection physics which are both a subset of Maxwell's
equations.

Cecil, have you ever read the book _Don Quixote_, by Cervantes?
There's a character in there you remind me of.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

Tom Donaly wrote:
Cecil, have you ever read the book _Don Quixote_, by Cervantes?
There's a character in there you remind me of.

Tom, please don't tell me that you also believe that a distributed-
network analysis using wave reflection theory is "gobbledygook".
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 02:29:51 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:

Tom Donaly wrote:
Cecil, have you ever read the book _Don Quixote_, by Cervantes?
There's a character in there you remind me of.

Tom, please don't tell me that you also believe that a distributed-
network analysis using wave reflection theory is "gobbledygook".

Hmm, Tom, let me guess - Dulcinea. The object of Quixote's attention
who never appears, but is always dreamt about.

Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 02:29:51 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:


Tom Donaly wrote:

Cecil, have you ever read the book _Don Quixote_, by Cervantes?
There's a character in there you remind me of.

Tom, please don't tell me that you also believe that a distributed-
network analysis using wave reflection theory is "gobbledygook".


Hmm, Tom, let me guess - Dulcinea. The object of Quixote's attention
who never appears, but is always dreamt about.

Hi Richard,
that sounds like Cecil's theory, which he's always ready to
defend with his strong right arm. I can't believe all the fuss he's made
over something as trivial as a loading coil.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

Tom Donaly wrote:
that sounds like Cecil's theory, which he's always ready to
defend with his strong right arm. I can't believe all the fuss he's made
over something as trivial as a loading coil.

As long as someone asserts that there is no phase shift
through a 75m mobile bugcatcher coil, I will continue
pointing out that they are wrong. The phase shift
through a 75m bugcatcher coil is approximately the
same as it is at the bugcatcher coil's self-resonant
frequency. That's simply a law of physics that some
people wish didn't exist but it does in spite of
their wishes.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

Cecil Moore wrote:

Tom Donaly wrote:

Cecil, have you ever read the book _Don Quixote_, by Cervantes?
There's a character in there you remind me of.


Tom, please don't tell me that you also believe that a distributed-
network analysis using wave reflection theory is "gobbledygook".

It is when the components are small enough in relation to a wavelength
that you don't have to use "a distributed-network analysis". Actually,
the way you've been talking about it, lately, it sounds more like
word salad than gobbledygook.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH