Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Popelish wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: We may understand the results of Tom's latest measurement by considering the following: 50 ohm source===1 WL 50 ohm lossless coax===8+j2500 load I am not sure I understand this. As I understand an S parameter tester, both source and load are 50 ohms. Tom says he fed and monitored the signal with a pair of current transformers. I don't think he fed the coil with a current transformer. I think he simply had the coil across the signal generator's output terminals with current pickup devices at each end of the coil. The above diagram doesn't change anything about his configuration but does point out the conceptual mistake he made which is the identical conceptual mistake that he and Roy have been making for years. Their model presupposes their measured results. How could their results be anything else? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |