Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
(snip) The question is: For a well-designed coil, is the self- resonance method valid for determining the delay through a coil at HF frequencies below the self-resonant frequency? Yes, that is an excellent question. Since that's been an accepted way of doing it for more than a century, This is a conclusion I have not seen you support, except with repeated assertions. Can you offer something more substantial? Surely a few references have accumulated in that century. How did you learn about this as the accepted way? I don't see how anyone could object. Man, what I don't see, could almost fill a universe. But I don't use it to try to win arguments. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |