LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 13th 06, 07:50 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default Current through coils

John Popelish wrote:
I also note that the opening statement:

"For closewound coils, with length to diameter ratios around 5:1, a
series of fairly careful measurements have been made with the coils
arranged vertically above a ground plane, fed at the base, with a
capacitive load on the other end, and the driving frequency arranged to
be at the resonant frequency of the whole assembly."

This definitely specifies only a single frequency for the test.


Yes, a 75m mobile base-loaded antenna is a single frequency
antenna. Why are you surprised? Those guys have figured out
something that I haven't, probably because they have better
tools at their disposal than I do. They seem to have a 1%
accurate model at frequencies other than the self-resonant
frequency. I, OTOH, am only sure of my accuracy at the
self-resonant frequency due to the limited tools at my
disposal.

So I don't see how this reference
supports your claim that measuring the delay at resonance tells you the
delay at other frequencies. It also contradicts your claim about how a
standing wave makes it difficult to measure the current delay through
the coil. What have I missed?


You missed the complete point, John. If one cannot eliminate
reflections from the measuring process, then use them to your
advantage in the measurements. Self-resonance means that the
forward wave is in phase with the reflected wave. The first
time that happens is when the wave has made a 180 degree round
trip to the tip of the antenna and back, i.e. it happens first
at self-resonance, when the coil is electrically 90 degrees
long. For a well-designed coil, like a well-designed transmission
line, it doesn't vary by much over HF frequencies. In short,
the self-resonance velocity factor should extend pretty well
to all HF frequencies below that self-resonance point. I need
to think about the frequencies above the self-resonance point,
but that doesn't apply to the present discussion.

I guess I should re-phrase my statement. Standing waves make
it difficult for *ME* and W8JI to measure the current delay
through the coil. I ran essentially the exact experiment that
W8JI ran with identical results. I even used the current pickups
that W8JI kindly furnished to me. The only difference between
W8JI and me is that I recognized the results to be bogus.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Current in Loading Coils Cecil Moore Antenna 2 March 5th 06 08:26 PM
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 05:41 PM
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter Stephen G. Gulyas Scanner 17 December 7th 04 06:42 PM
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) Roy Lewallen Antenna 25 January 15th 04 09:11 PM
Current in antenna loading coils controversy Yuri Blanarovich Antenna 454 December 12th 03 03:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017