Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Popelish wrote:
I also note that the opening statement: "For closewound coils, with length to diameter ratios around 5:1, a series of fairly careful measurements have been made with the coils arranged vertically above a ground plane, fed at the base, with a capacitive load on the other end, and the driving frequency arranged to be at the resonant frequency of the whole assembly." This definitely specifies only a single frequency for the test. Yes, a 75m mobile base-loaded antenna is a single frequency antenna. Why are you surprised? Those guys have figured out something that I haven't, probably because they have better tools at their disposal than I do. They seem to have a 1% accurate model at frequencies other than the self-resonant frequency. I, OTOH, am only sure of my accuracy at the self-resonant frequency due to the limited tools at my disposal. So I don't see how this reference supports your claim that measuring the delay at resonance tells you the delay at other frequencies. It also contradicts your claim about how a standing wave makes it difficult to measure the current delay through the coil. What have I missed? You missed the complete point, John. If one cannot eliminate reflections from the measuring process, then use them to your advantage in the measurements. Self-resonance means that the forward wave is in phase with the reflected wave. The first time that happens is when the wave has made a 180 degree round trip to the tip of the antenna and back, i.e. it happens first at self-resonance, when the coil is electrically 90 degrees long. For a well-designed coil, like a well-designed transmission line, it doesn't vary by much over HF frequencies. In short, the self-resonance velocity factor should extend pretty well to all HF frequencies below that self-resonance point. I need to think about the frequencies above the self-resonance point, but that doesn't apply to the present discussion. I guess I should re-phrase my statement. Standing waves make it difficult for *ME* and W8JI to measure the current delay through the coil. I ran essentially the exact experiment that W8JI ran with identical results. I even used the current pickups that W8JI kindly furnished to me. The only difference between W8JI and me is that I recognized the results to be bogus. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |