Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Popelish wrote:
... I see no reason to assume the transmission line method (delay independent of frequency) strictly applies. It might, but it would take more than you saying so to assure me that it is a fact. Assume the environment of the coil is fixed like the variable stinger measurement I reported earlier. Besides the frequency term, the phase constant depends upon L, C, R, and G as does the Z0 equation. Why would the L, C, R, and G change appreciably over a relatively narrow frequency range as in my bugcatcher coil measurements going from 6.7 MHz to 3.0 MHz? And I didn't mean to imply that the delay is "independent" of frequency, just that it is not nearly as frequency dependent as Tom's measurements would suggest. If Tom made his measurements from 1 MHz to 16 MHz, what do you think the curve would look like? Freq 1 2 4 8 16 MHz Delay ___ ___ 3 ___ 16 nS That looks non-linear to me. How about you? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |