Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Clark wrote: Having built nigh on an hundred, you are right - I don't have one now. I don't plan to build anymore either as it would do nothing to lower the text noise floor. I've enjoyed the speculation tho'. The two most humorous parts of this entire thing: 1.) RF current can stand still, yet cause current in a transformer secondary. 2.) We have to use a "directional current coupler" to sort current flowing one way from current floing the other, because of standing wave current. This entire thing has become almost laughable. It looks like the thread has regressed to the point where people no longer understand directional couplers or current transformers. Anyone who knows how a directional coupler works is rolling around on the floor laughing at the suggestion of sorting "forward current" from "reflected current". It appears this thread has reached the lowest level, where impossible to build instrumentation is now demanded as the only acceptable proof. What a trip! 73 Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |